1996 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jaguar XK | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XK | Epica |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |