1996 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Ford E-350

To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.

Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (535 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Jaguar XK 2010 Ford E-350
Make Jaguar Ford
Model XK E-350
Year Released 1996 2010
Body Type Coupe Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3996 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 370 HP 177 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 535 Nm 184 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4437 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 57 L