1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (114 HP @ 3900 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 769 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cedric |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |