1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 870 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (301 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1170 mm |