1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (114 HP @ 3900 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1340 mm |
