1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Nissan R 391. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (301 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | R 391 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
