1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 72 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1648 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |