1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (114 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 612 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.

Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (300 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (170 Nm). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 Suzuki Reno
Make Jeep Suzuki
Model Grand Cherokee Reno
Year Released 1996 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 114 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 3900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 170 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1854 kg 1242 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1450 mm