1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1044 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | MPV |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |