1996 Kia Avella vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1996 Kia Avella is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 455 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Avella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Avella | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Kia | Studebaker |
Model | Avella | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2980 mm |