1996 Kia Avella vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Kia Avella is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 175 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Kia Avella | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Avella | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2620 mm |
