1996 Kia Avella vs. 2002 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Avella would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 775 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Kia Avella. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella. 2002 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1996 Kia Avella has manual transmission. 1996 Kia Avella will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: