1996 Kia Avella vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Avella would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Kia Avella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Kia Avella (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Kia Avella should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 230 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Avella | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Avella | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2580 mm |