1996 Kia Avella vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Avella would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 370 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Avella | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Avella | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2600 mm |