1996 Kia Avella vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Avella would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1996 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1389 kg more than 1996 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Avella | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Avella | Tundra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 3220 mm |