1996 Kia Clarus vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Kia Clarus is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 114 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 70 kg more than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Kia Clarus | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Clarus | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
