1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Kia Clarus weights approximately 101 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Clarus | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |