1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Kia | MG |
Model | Clarus | TF |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2380 mm |