1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Clarus | MX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |