1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Kia Clarus weights approximately 29 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Kia Clarus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Clarus | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2880 mm |