1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Kia Clarus (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 10 kg more than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Clarus | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |