1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Clarus | Commodore |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |