1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2011 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2011 Nissan Cube is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Kia Clarus. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Clarus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Cube weights approximately 48 kg more than 1996 Kia Clarus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Clarus. (152 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Clarus | 2011 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Clarus | Cube |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2530 mm |