1996 Kia Clarus vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Kia Clarus (114 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Kia Clarus | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Clarus | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2360 mm |
