1996 Kia Retona vs. 1983 Maserati Merak
To start off, 1996 Kia Retona is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 1,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Maserati Merak is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Maserati Merak (157 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1996 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Kia Retona weights approximately 520 kg more than 1983 Maserati Merak.
Because 1996 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Maserati Merak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Kia Retona | 1983 Maserati Merak | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Retona | Merak |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |