1996 Lada 110 vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 110 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2320 mm |