1996 Lada 110 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lada 110 (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1996 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Lada | MCC |
Model | 110 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1810 mm |