1996 Lada 110 vs. 2005 Volvo C70
To start off, 2005 Volvo C70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo C70 (341 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2005 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Lada | Volvo |
Model | 110 | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 341 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 90 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |