1996 Lada 110 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lada 110 (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ka (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Lada | Ford |
Model | 110 | Ka |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17.6:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12 seconds | 13.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2310 mm |