1996 Lada 110 vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Lada | Ford |
Model | 110 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |