1996 Lada 110 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Lada | Honda |
Model | 110 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2436 mm |