1996 Lada 110 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada 110 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | 110 | Evora |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2575 mm |