1996 Lada Natacha vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada Natacha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Lada Natacha. (70 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada Natacha | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | Natacha | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |