1996 Lada Natacha vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (124 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Lada Natacha. (70 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Natacha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 285 kg more than 1996 Lada Natacha. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada Natacha | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Lada | Kia |
Model | Natacha | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |