1996 Lada Niva vs. 2004 MG ZR
To start off, 2004 MG ZR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZR (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lada Niva weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 MG ZR.
Because 1996 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MG ZR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lada Niva (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada Niva | 2004 MG ZR | |
Make | Lada | MG |
Model | Niva | ZR |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |