1996 Lada Samara vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1996 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 519 kg more than 1996 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Samara. (98 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lada Samara | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |