1996 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1996 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,709 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lamborghini Diablo (595 HP) has 525 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1996 Lamborghini Diablo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lamborghini Diablo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lamborghini Diablo (471 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 1996 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lamborghini Diablo | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Nissan |
| Model | Diablo | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5709 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 595 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 471 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2420 mm |
