1996 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lamborghini Diablo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lamborghini Diablo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lamborghini Diablo weights approximately 142 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lamborghini Diablo (580 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. (250 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lamborghini Diablo | 2008 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Lamborghini | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Diablo | C |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 485 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 580 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 334 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 21.5 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 66 L |