1996 Lancia Delta vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1996 Lancia Delta is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Delta (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Delta weights approximately 115 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Delta (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Delta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Delta | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Delta | 220 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |