1996 Lancia Kappa vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (201 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 355 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (270 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Kappa | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lancia | Triumph |
Model | Kappa | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |