1996 Lancia Kappa vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 598 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Kappa | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Kappa | 616 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |