1996 Lancia Kappa vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (122 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Kappa | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Kappa | 66 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |