1996 Lancia Kappa vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (122 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 375 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Kappa (270 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Lancia Kappa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lancia Kappa | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Kappa | 626 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |
