1996 Lancia Kappa vs. 2003 MG ZT

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 2,451 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (173 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Kappa weights approximately 35 kg more than 2003 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lancia Kappa. (230 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lancia Kappa.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Lancia Kappa 2003 MG ZT
Make Lancia MG
Model Kappa ZT
Year Released 1996 2003
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2451 cc 1951 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 173 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 230 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1520 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2760 mm