1996 Lancia Zeta vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1996 Lancia Zeta. (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1996 Lancia Zeta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 756 kg more than 1996 Lancia Zeta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Zeta | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Lancia | Lincoln |
Model | Zeta | Continental |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3210 mm |