1996 Lancia Zeta vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Lancia Zeta. (109 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1996 Lancia Zeta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 295 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Zeta (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Zeta | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lancia | Oldsmobile |
Model | Zeta | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |