1996 Lancia Zeta vs. 1992 Opel Omega
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,408 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Zeta | 1992 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lancia | Opel |
Model | Zeta | Omega |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2740 mm |