1996 Lancia Zeta vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Lancia Zeta. (109 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1996 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Lancia Zeta | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zeta | FTO |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2510 mm |