1996 Land Rover Discovery vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Land Rover Discovery. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Land Rover Discovery would be higher. At 3,944 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1076 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1996 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda Rustler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Land Rover Discovery (320 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Land Rover Discovery | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Discovery | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 3944 cc | 1586 cc |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
