1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1958 Maserati 300
To start off, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Maserati 300 (243 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. (188 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Maserati 300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1958 Maserati 300.
Because 1996 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Maserati 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Land Rover Range Rover | 1958 Maserati 300 | |
Make | Land Rover | Maserati |
Model | Range Rover | 300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 243 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |